7 BREW vs Fala Bar

Compare FDD disclosures, investment range, royalty and ad fund burden, SBA lending outcomes, Item 20-style unit movement, Item 19 transparency, and data-confidence caveats with a permanent shareable URL.

Share this page
https://fddiq.com/compare/7-brew-vs-fala-bar
7 BREW
Casual Dining
Investment
$894K to $2.2M
Franchise fee
$35,000
Item 19 status
Revenue Only
Confidence
High Confidence
Units
137
Fala Bar
Casual Dining
Investment
$123K to $271K
Franchise fee
$20,000
Item 19 status
Limited Data
Confidence
Medium Confidence
Units
4
Lower entry cost
Leans right
Based on disclosed minimum initial investment only; buyer cash needs may be higher after working capital, lease, and financing assumptions.
Better disclosed economics
7 BREW
Uses the same Item 19 transparency hierarchy shown on franchise pages and rankings.
Lower SBA default risk
Even
Treat low-loan brands carefully; sample size and SBA borrower mix matter.
Metric7 BREWFala Bar
Franchise Fee
From disclosed FDD fee data when available; excludes buyer-specific legal, diligence, and financing costs.
$35,000$20,000
Min Investment
Lower bound of disclosed initial investment range, not a recommended capital budget.
$894K$123K
Max Investment
Upper end of FDD range; still reconcile to site, lease, buildout, and working-capital assumptions.
$2.2M$271K
Royalty Rate
Ongoing royalty burden before local store economics and owner salary.
7.0%3.0%
Ad Fund Rate
National/brand fund rate when disclosed; local marketing may be additive.
2.0%1.0%
Total Ongoing Burden
Royalty plus ad fund when available.
9.0%4.0%
Median Revenue (Item 19)
Only meaningful when the franchisor provides an Item 19 financial-performance representation.
$2.1MN/A
Cash-on-Cash Return
Estimated when revenue and margin assumptions are available.
1.3%N/A
Payback Period
74.5 yrsN/A
Revenue per Dollar Invested
1.34xN/A
Franchised Units
Latest disclosed franchised-unit count in the corpus.
1374
1-Year Net Unit Change
Item 20-style system movement signal; investigate transfers, closures, and refranchising before assuming organic growth.
N/AN/A
Net Unit Growth Rate
N/AN/A
Net Closure Rate
Net closure proxy based on disclosed unit change.
N/AN/A
SBA Default Rate
Historical SBA performance for matched loans, not a prediction for a new buyer or location.
0.0%0.0%
SBA Loan Count
Use this to judge whether SBA default data is statistically meaningful.
211
Average SBA Loan Size
$1.1M$272K
Item 19 Status
Canonical transparency badge used across franchise, ranking, and compare surfaces.
Revenue OnlyLimited Data
Has Item 19
✓ Yes✓ Yes
Data Confidence
Derived from the same data-quality thresholds used on franchise pages.
High Confidence · 100/100Medium Confidence · 75/100

What stands out

  • 7 BREW discloses an initial investment range of $894K to $2.2M, while Fala Bar discloses $123K to $271K. Treat these as FDD ranges, not a full purchase budget.
  • 7 BREW shows an Item 19 financial-performance disclosure; Fala Bar shows an Item 19 financial-performance disclosure. Missing Item 19 data should narrow confidence, not automatically kill a brand.
  • 7 BREW has 137 franchised units versus 4 for Fala Bar; use one-year net unit movement and closure proxies as early diligence signals, not final underwriting.

Turn this into a buy-side memo

Unlock full compare access, then order a deeper FDD report with franchise-agreement red flags, source-document caveats, buyer assumptions, and an investment thesis you can share with partners or lenders.

Last updated: May 2026