Baymont Inn & Suites vs ECONO LODGE

Compare FDD disclosures, investment range, royalty and ad fund burden, SBA lending outcomes, Item 20-style unit movement, Item 19 transparency, and data-confidence caveats with a permanent shareable URL.

Share this page
https://fddiq.com/compare/baymont-inn-suites-vs-econo-lodge
Baymont Inn & Suites
Travel
Investment
$225K to $10.5M
Franchise fee
$26,000
Item 19 status
Limited Data
Confidence
High Confidence
Units
539
ECONO LODGE
Travel
Investment
$186K to $1.0M
Franchise fee
$30,000
Item 19 status
Limited Data
Confidence
High Confidence
Units
677
Lower entry cost
Leans right
Based on disclosed minimum initial investment only; buyer cash needs may be higher after working capital, lease, and financing assumptions.
Better disclosed economics
Even
Uses the same Item 19 transparency hierarchy shown on franchise pages and rankings.
Lower SBA default risk
Leans right
Treat low-loan brands carefully; sample size and SBA borrower mix matter.
MetricBaymont Inn & SuitesECONO LODGE
Franchise Fee
From disclosed FDD fee data when available; excludes buyer-specific legal, diligence, and financing costs.
$26,000$30,000
Min Investment
Lower bound of disclosed initial investment range, not a recommended capital budget.
$225K$186K
Max Investment
Upper end of FDD range; still reconcile to site, lease, buildout, and working-capital assumptions.
$10.5M$1.0M
Royalty Rate
Ongoing royalty burden before local store economics and owner salary.
5.0%5.0%
Ad Fund Rate
National/brand fund rate when disclosed; local marketing may be additive.
3.5%3.5%
Total Ongoing Burden
Royalty plus ad fund when available.
8.5%8.5%
Median Revenue (Item 19)
Only meaningful when the franchisor provides an Item 19 financial-performance representation.
N/AN/A
Cash-on-Cash Return
Estimated when revenue and margin assumptions are available.
N/AN/A
Payback Period
N/AN/A
Revenue per Dollar Invested
N/AN/A
Franchised Units
Latest disclosed franchised-unit count in the corpus.
539677
1-Year Net Unit Change
Item 20-style system movement signal; investigate transfers, closures, and refranchising before assuming organic growth.
18-34
Net Unit Growth Rate
3.5%-4.8%
Net Closure Rate
Net closure proxy based on disclosed unit change.
N/A4.8%
SBA Default Rate
Historical SBA performance for matched loans, not a prediction for a new buyer or location.
1.4%1.0%
SBA Loan Count
Use this to judge whether SBA default data is statistically meaningful.
88125
Average SBA Loan Size
$2.2M$1.6M
Item 19 Status
Canonical transparency badge used across franchise, ranking, and compare surfaces.
Limited DataLimited Data
Has Item 19
✓ Yes✓ Yes
Data Confidence
Derived from the same data-quality thresholds used on franchise pages.
High Confidence · 85/100High Confidence · 85/100

What stands out

  • Baymont Inn & Suites discloses an initial investment range of $225K to $10.5M, while ECONO LODGE discloses $186K to $1.0M. Treat these as FDD ranges, not a full purchase budget.
  • Baymont Inn & Suites shows an Item 19 financial-performance disclosure; ECONO LODGE shows an Item 19 financial-performance disclosure. Missing Item 19 data should narrow confidence, not automatically kill a brand.
  • Baymont Inn & Suites has 539 franchised units versus 677 for ECONO LODGE; use one-year net unit movement and closure proxies as early diligence signals, not final underwriting.

Turn this into a buy-side memo

Unlock full compare access, then order a deeper FDD report with franchise-agreement red flags, source-document caveats, buyer assumptions, and an investment thesis you can share with partners or lenders.

Last updated: May 2026