Bee Hive Homes vs SnapHouss

Compare FDD disclosures, investment range, royalty and ad fund burden, SBA lending outcomes, Item 20-style unit movement, Item 19 transparency, and data-confidence caveats with a permanent shareable URL.

Share this page
https://fddiq.com/compare/bee-hive-homes-vs-snaphouss
Bee Hive Homes
Real Estate
Investment
$3.4M to $5.1M
Franchise fee
$75,000
Item 19 status
Limited Data
Confidence
Medium Confidence
Units
199
SnapHouss
Real Estate
Investment
$31K to $130K
Franchise fee
$9,900
Item 19 status
Revenue Only
Confidence
High Confidence
Units
18
Lower entry cost
Leans right
Based on disclosed minimum initial investment only; buyer cash needs may be higher after working capital, lease, and financing assumptions.
Better disclosed economics
SnapHouss
Uses the same Item 19 transparency hierarchy shown on franchise pages and rankings.
Lower SBA default risk
Even
Treat low-loan brands carefully; sample size and SBA borrower mix matter.
MetricBee Hive HomesSnapHouss
Franchise Fee
From disclosed FDD fee data when available; excludes buyer-specific legal, diligence, and financing costs.
$75,000$9,900
Min Investment
Lower bound of disclosed initial investment range, not a recommended capital budget.
$3.4M$31K
Max Investment
Upper end of FDD range; still reconcile to site, lease, buildout, and working-capital assumptions.
$5.1M$130K
Royalty Rate
Ongoing royalty burden before local store economics and owner salary.
5.0%7.0%
Ad Fund Rate
National/brand fund rate when disclosed; local marketing may be additive.
N/A4.0%
Total Ongoing Burden
Royalty plus ad fund when available.
5.0%11.0%
Median Revenue (Item 19)
Only meaningful when the franchisor provides an Item 19 financial-performance representation.
N/A$84K
Cash-on-Cash Return
Estimated when revenue and margin assumptions are available.
N/A9.4%
Payback Period
N/A10.7 yrs
Revenue per Dollar Invested
N/A1.04x
Franchised Units
Latest disclosed franchised-unit count in the corpus.
19918
1-Year Net Unit Change
Item 20-style system movement signal; investigate transfers, closures, and refranchising before assuming organic growth.
2N/A
Net Unit Growth Rate
1.0%N/A
Net Closure Rate
Net closure proxy based on disclosed unit change.
N/AN/A
SBA Default Rate
Historical SBA performance for matched loans, not a prediction for a new buyer or location.
1.6%N/A
SBA Loan Count
Use this to judge whether SBA default data is statistically meaningful.
99N/A
Average SBA Loan Size
$2.0MN/A
Item 19 Status
Canonical transparency badge used across franchise, ranking, and compare surfaces.
Limited DataRevenue Only
Has Item 19
✓ Yes✓ Yes
Data Confidence
Derived from the same data-quality thresholds used on franchise pages.
Medium Confidence · 73/100High Confidence · 100/100

What stands out

  • Bee Hive Homes discloses an initial investment range of $3.4M to $5.1M, while SnapHouss discloses $31K to $130K. Treat these as FDD ranges, not a full purchase budget.
  • Bee Hive Homes shows an Item 19 financial-performance disclosure; SnapHouss shows an Item 19 financial-performance disclosure. Missing Item 19 data should narrow confidence, not automatically kill a brand.
  • Bee Hive Homes has 199 franchised units versus 18 for SnapHouss; use one-year net unit movement and closure proxies as early diligence signals, not final underwriting.

Turn this into a buy-side memo

Unlock full compare access, then order a deeper FDD report with franchise-agreement red flags, source-document caveats, buyer assumptions, and an investment thesis you can share with partners or lenders.

Last updated: May 2026