BrightStar Franchising, LLC vs ACASA Senior Care

Compare FDD disclosures, investment range, royalty and ad fund burden, SBA lending outcomes, Item 20-style unit movement, Item 19 transparency, and data-confidence caveats with a permanent shareable URL.

Share this page
https://fddiq.com/compare/brightstar-vs-acasa-senior-care
BrightStar Franchising, LLC
Senior Care
Investment
$132K to $235K
Franchise fee
$50,000
Item 19 status
Confidence
High Confidence
Units
347
ACASA Senior Care
Senior Care
Investment
$82K to $132K
Franchise fee
$49,500
Item 19 status
Limited Data
Confidence
High Confidence
Units
0
Lower entry cost
Leans right
Based on disclosed minimum initial investment only; buyer cash needs may be higher after working capital, lease, and financing assumptions.
Better disclosed economics
ACASA Senior Care
Uses the same Item 19 transparency hierarchy shown on franchise pages and rankings.
Lower SBA default risk
Even
Treat low-loan brands carefully; sample size and SBA borrower mix matter.
MetricBrightStar Franchising, LLCACASA Senior Care
Franchise Fee
From disclosed FDD fee data when available; excludes buyer-specific legal, diligence, and financing costs.
$50,000$49,500
Min Investment
Lower bound of disclosed initial investment range, not a recommended capital budget.
$132K$82K
Max Investment
Upper end of FDD range; still reconcile to site, lease, buildout, and working-capital assumptions.
$235K$132K
Royalty Rate
Ongoing royalty burden before local store economics and owner salary.
5.3%5.0%
Ad Fund Rate
National/brand fund rate when disclosed; local marketing may be additive.
2.5%1.0%
Total Ongoing Burden
Royalty plus ad fund when available.
7.8%6.0%
Median Revenue (Item 19)
Only meaningful when the franchisor provides an Item 19 financial-performance representation.
$2.0MN/A
Cash-on-Cash Return
Estimated when revenue and margin assumptions are available.
110.7%N/A
Payback Period
0.9 yrsN/A
Revenue per Dollar Invested
10.80xN/A
Franchised Units
Latest disclosed franchised-unit count in the corpus.
3470
1-Year Net Unit Change
Item 20-style system movement signal; investigate transfers, closures, and refranchising before assuming organic growth.
26N/A
Net Unit Growth Rate
7.5%N/A
Net Closure Rate
Net closure proxy based on disclosed unit change.
N/AN/A
SBA Default Rate
Historical SBA performance for matched loans, not a prediction for a new buyer or location.
N/A0.0%
SBA Loan Count
Use this to judge whether SBA default data is statistically meaningful.
N/A34
Average SBA Loan Size
N/A$433K
Item 19 Status
Canonical transparency badge used across franchise, ranking, and compare surfaces.
Limited Data
Has Item 19
✓ Yes✓ Yes
Data Confidence
Derived from the same data-quality thresholds used on franchise pages.
High Confidence · 100/100High Confidence · 85/100

What stands out

  • BrightStar Franchising, LLC discloses an initial investment range of $132K to $235K, while ACASA Senior Care discloses $82K to $132K. Treat these as FDD ranges, not a full purchase budget.
  • BrightStar Franchising, LLC shows an Item 19 financial-performance disclosure; ACASA Senior Care shows an Item 19 financial-performance disclosure. Missing Item 19 data should narrow confidence, not automatically kill a brand.
  • BrightStar Franchising, LLC has 347 franchised units versus 0 for ACASA Senior Care; use one-year net unit movement and closure proxies as early diligence signals, not final underwriting.

Turn this into a buy-side memo

Unlock full compare access, then order a deeper FDD report with franchise-agreement red flags, source-document caveats, buyer assumptions, and an investment thesis you can share with partners or lenders.

Last updated: May 2026