Huey Magoo's Restaurants, LLC vs Pete's Restaurant & Brewhouse

Compare FDD disclosures, investment range, royalty and ad fund burden, SBA lending outcomes, Item 20-style unit movement, Item 19 transparency, and data-confidence caveats with a permanent shareable URL.

Share this page
https://fddiq.com/compare/huey-magoo-s-restaurants-vs-pete-s-restaurant-brewhouse
Huey Magoo's Restaurants, LLC
Casual Dining
Investment
$933K to $3.0M
Franchise fee
$35,000
Item 19 status
Confidence
High Confidence
Units
12
Pete's Restaurant & Brewhouse
Casual Dining
Investment
$742K to $3.3M
Franchise fee
$50,000
Item 19 status
Limited Data
Confidence
Medium Confidence
Units
N/A
Lower entry cost
Leans right
Based on disclosed minimum initial investment only; buyer cash needs may be higher after working capital, lease, and financing assumptions.
Better disclosed economics
Pete's Restaurant & Brewhouse
Uses the same Item 19 transparency hierarchy shown on franchise pages and rankings.
Lower SBA default risk
Even
Treat low-loan brands carefully; sample size and SBA borrower mix matter.
MetricHuey Magoo's Restaurants, LLCPete's Restaurant & Brewhouse
Franchise Fee
From disclosed FDD fee data when available; excludes buyer-specific legal, diligence, and financing costs.
$35,000$50,000
Min Investment
Lower bound of disclosed initial investment range, not a recommended capital budget.
$933K$742K
Max Investment
Upper end of FDD range; still reconcile to site, lease, buildout, and working-capital assumptions.
$3.0M$3.3M
Royalty Rate
Ongoing royalty burden before local store economics and owner salary.
5.0%4.0%
Ad Fund Rate
National/brand fund rate when disclosed; local marketing may be additive.
2.0%1.0%
Total Ongoing Burden
Royalty plus ad fund when available.
7.0%5.0%
Median Revenue (Item 19)
Only meaningful when the franchisor provides an Item 19 financial-performance representation.
$2.1MN/A
Cash-on-Cash Return
Estimated when revenue and margin assumptions are available.
3.3%N/A
Payback Period
30.6 yrsN/A
Revenue per Dollar Invested
1.09xN/A
Franchised Units
Latest disclosed franchised-unit count in the corpus.
12N/A
1-Year Net Unit Change
Item 20-style system movement signal; investigate transfers, closures, and refranchising before assuming organic growth.
N/AN/A
Net Unit Growth Rate
N/AN/A
Net Closure Rate
Net closure proxy based on disclosed unit change.
N/AN/A
SBA Default Rate
Historical SBA performance for matched loans, not a prediction for a new buyer or location.
N/AN/A
SBA Loan Count
Use this to judge whether SBA default data is statistically meaningful.
N/AN/A
Average SBA Loan Size
N/AN/A
Item 19 Status
Canonical transparency badge used across franchise, ranking, and compare surfaces.
Limited Data
Has Item 19
✓ Yes✓ Yes
Data Confidence
Derived from the same data-quality thresholds used on franchise pages.
High Confidence · 98/100Medium Confidence · 65/100

What stands out

  • Huey Magoo's Restaurants, LLC discloses an initial investment range of $933K to $3.0M, while Pete's Restaurant & Brewhouse discloses $742K to $3.3M. Treat these as FDD ranges, not a full purchase budget.
  • Huey Magoo's Restaurants, LLC shows an Item 19 financial-performance disclosure; Pete's Restaurant & Brewhouse shows an Item 19 financial-performance disclosure. Missing Item 19 data should narrow confidence, not automatically kill a brand.
  • Huey Magoo's Restaurants, LLC has 12 franchised units versus N/A for Pete's Restaurant & Brewhouse; use one-year net unit movement and closure proxies as early diligence signals, not final underwriting.

Turn this into a buy-side memo

Unlock full compare access, then order a deeper FDD report with franchise-agreement red flags, source-document caveats, buyer assumptions, and an investment thesis you can share with partners or lenders.

Last updated: May 2026