Hungry Howie’s Pizza & Subs, Inc. vs Chick-fil-A, Inc.

Compare FDD disclosures, investment range, royalty and ad fund burden, SBA lending outcomes, Item 20-style unit movement, Item 19 transparency, and data-confidence caveats with a permanent shareable URL.

Share this page
https://fddiq.com/compare/hungry-howie-s-pizza-subs-vs-chick-fil-a
Hungry Howie’s Pizza & Subs, Inc.
QSR
Investment
$319K to $520K
Franchise fee
$25,000
Item 19 status
Confidence
High Confidence
Units
501
Chick-fil-A, Inc.
QSR
Investment
$427K to $2.3M
Franchise fee
$10,000
Item 19 status
Revenue Only
Confidence
High Confidence
Units
2,494
Lower entry cost
Leans left
Based on disclosed minimum initial investment only; buyer cash needs may be higher after working capital, lease, and financing assumptions.
Better disclosed economics
Chick-fil-A, Inc.
Uses the same Item 19 transparency hierarchy shown on franchise pages and rankings.
Lower SBA default risk
Leans right
Treat low-loan brands carefully; sample size and SBA borrower mix matter.
MetricHungry Howie’s Pizza & Subs, Inc.Chick-fil-A, Inc.
Franchise Fee
From disclosed FDD fee data when available; excludes buyer-specific legal, diligence, and financing costs.
$25,000$10,000
Min Investment
Lower bound of disclosed initial investment range, not a recommended capital budget.
$319K$427K
Max Investment
Upper end of FDD range; still reconcile to site, lease, buildout, and working-capital assumptions.
$520K$2.3M
Royalty Rate
Ongoing royalty burden before local store economics and owner salary.
5.5%15.0%
Ad Fund Rate
National/brand fund rate when disclosed; local marketing may be additive.
7.0%0.0%
Total Ongoing Burden
Royalty plus ad fund when available.
12.5%15.0%
Median Revenue (Item 19)
Only meaningful when the franchisor provides an Item 19 financial-performance representation.
N/A$3.4M
Cash-on-Cash Return
Estimated when revenue and margin assumptions are available.
N/A0.0%
Payback Period
N/AN/A
Revenue per Dollar Invested
N/A2.45x
Franchised Units
Latest disclosed franchised-unit count in the corpus.
5012,494
1-Year Net Unit Change
Item 20-style system movement signal; investigate transfers, closures, and refranchising before assuming organic growth.
3135
Net Unit Growth Rate
0.6%5.8%
Net Closure Rate
Net closure proxy based on disclosed unit change.
N/AN/A
SBA Default Rate
Historical SBA performance for matched loans, not a prediction for a new buyer or location.
16.0%0.0%
SBA Loan Count
Use this to judge whether SBA default data is statistically meaningful.
261
Average SBA Loan Size
$250K$3.0M
Item 19 Status
Canonical transparency badge used across franchise, ranking, and compare surfaces.
Revenue Only
Has Item 19
✓ Yes✓ Yes
Data Confidence
Derived from the same data-quality thresholds used on franchise pages.
High Confidence · 83/100High Confidence · 100/100

What stands out

  • Hungry Howie’s Pizza & Subs, Inc. discloses an initial investment range of $319K to $520K, while Chick-fil-A, Inc. discloses $427K to $2.3M. Treat these as FDD ranges, not a full purchase budget.
  • Hungry Howie’s Pizza & Subs, Inc. shows an Item 19 financial-performance disclosure; Chick-fil-A, Inc. shows an Item 19 financial-performance disclosure. Missing Item 19 data should narrow confidence, not automatically kill a brand.
  • Hungry Howie’s Pizza & Subs, Inc. has 501 franchised units versus 2,494 for Chick-fil-A, Inc.; use one-year net unit movement and closure proxies as early diligence signals, not final underwriting.

Turn this into a buy-side memo

Unlock full compare access, then order a deeper FDD report with franchise-agreement red flags, source-document caveats, buyer assumptions, and an investment thesis you can share with partners or lenders.

Last updated: May 2026