Image360 vs Max Muscle

Compare franchise fees, investment range, royalties, SBA lending performance, unit growth, and Item 19 transparency with a permanent shareable URL.

Share this page
https://fddiq.com/compare/image360-vs-max-muscle
Image360
Retail
Investment
$218K to $502K
Franchise fee
$40,000
Item 19 status
Cost Data Only
Units
125
Max Muscle
Retail
Investment
$94K to $284K
Franchise fee
$35,000
Item 19 status
Cost Data Only
Units
125
Lower entry cost
Leans right
Based on minimum initial investment.
Better disclosed economics
Even
Uses Item 19 availability and transparency status.
Lower SBA default risk
Leans right
Treat low-loan brands carefully, sample size matters.
MetricImage360Max Muscle
Franchise Fee
$40,000$35,000
Min Investment
$218K$94K
Max Investment
$502K$284K
Royalty Rate
2.0%6.0%
Ad Fund Rate
2.0%2.0%
Total Ongoing Burden
Royalty plus ad fund when available.
4.0%8.0%
Median Revenue (Item 19)
$724K$16K
Cash-on-Cash Return
Estimated when revenue and margin assumptions are available.
16.1%0.3%
Payback Period
6.2 yrs287.1 yrs
Revenue per Dollar Invested
2.01x0.09x
Franchised Units
125125
1-Year Net Unit Change
-2-4
Net Unit Growth Rate
-1.6%-3.9%
Net Closure Rate
Net closure proxy based on disclosed unit change.
1.6%3.1%
SBA Default Rate
27.3%22.2%
SBA Loan Count
Use this to judge whether SBA default data is statistically meaningful.
3518
Average SBA Loan Size
$355K$132K
Item 19 Status
Cost Data OnlyCost Data Only
Has Item 19
✓ Yes✓ Yes
Data Quality Score
100100

What stands out

  • Image360 opens at $218K to $502K, while Max Muscle ranges from $94K to $284K.
  • Image360 shows an Item 19 disclosure; Max Muscle shows an Item 19 disclosure.
  • Image360 has 125 franchised units versus 125 for Max Muscle.

Turn this into a buy-side memo

Unlock full compare access, then order a deeper FDD report with litigation review, red flags, and an investment thesis you can share with partners or lenders.

Last updated: April 2026