Krystal vs SIZZLER®

Compare franchise fees, investment range, royalties, SBA lending performance, unit growth, and Item 19 transparency with a permanent shareable URL.

Share this page
https://fddiq.com/compare/krystal-vs-sizzler
Krystal
Casual Dining
Investment
$470K to $2.2M
Franchise fee
$35,000
Item 19 status
Revenue Only
Units
143
SIZZLER®
Casual Dining
Investment
$1.3M to $2.6M
Franchise fee
$35,000
Item 19 status
Revenue Only
Units
116
Lower entry cost
Leans left
Based on minimum initial investment.
Better disclosed economics
Even
Uses Item 19 availability and transparency status.
Lower SBA default risk
Leans left
Treat low-loan brands carefully, sample size matters.
MetricKrystalSIZZLER®
Franchise Fee
$35,000$35,000
Min Investment
$470K$1.3M
Max Investment
$2.2M$2.6M
Royalty Rate
5.0%4.0%
Ad Fund Rate
4.5%0.5%
Total Ongoing Burden
Royalty plus ad fund when available.
9.5%4.5%
Median Revenue (Item 19)
$961K$1.9M
Cash-on-Cash Return
Estimated when revenue and margin assumptions are available.
0.4%5.4%
Payback Period
273.6 yrs18.4 yrs
Revenue per Dollar Invested
0.73x0.99x
Franchised Units
143116
1-Year Net Unit Change
13-4
Net Unit Growth Rate
10.2%-3.4%
Net Closure Rate
Net closure proxy based on disclosed unit change.
N/A3.3%
SBA Default Rate
0.0%20.0%
SBA Loan Count
Use this to judge whether SBA default data is statistically meaningful.
15
Average SBA Loan Size
$322K$626K
Item 19 Status
Revenue OnlyRevenue Only
Has Item 19
✓ Yes✓ Yes
Data Quality Score
10098

What stands out

  • Krystal opens at $470K to $2.2M, while SIZZLER® ranges from $1.3M to $2.6M.
  • Krystal shows an Item 19 disclosure; SIZZLER® shows an Item 19 disclosure.
  • Krystal has 143 franchised units versus 116 for SIZZLER®.

Turn this into a buy-side memo

Unlock full compare access, then order a deeper FDD report with litigation review, red flags, and an investment thesis you can share with partners or lenders.

Last updated: April 2026