360 Painting vs Neat Method

Compare franchise fees, investment range, royalties, SBA lending performance, unit growth, and Item 19 transparency with a permanent shareable URL.

Share this page
https://fddiq.com/compare/360-painting-vs-neat-method
360 Painting
Home Services
Investment
$112K to $196K
Franchise fee
$65,000
Item 19 status
Revenue Only
Units
160
Neat Method
Home Services
Investment
$38K to $45K
Franchise fee
$30,000
Item 19 status
Cost Data Only
Units
94
Lower entry cost
Leans right
Based on minimum initial investment.
Better disclosed economics
Even
Uses Item 19 availability and transparency status.
Lower SBA default risk
Even
Treat low-loan brands carefully, sample size matters.
Metric360 PaintingNeat Method
Franchise Fee
$65,000$30,000
Min Investment
$112K$38K
Max Investment
$196K$45K
Royalty Rate
6.0%N/A
Ad Fund Rate
2.0%N/A
Total Ongoing Burden
Royalty plus ad fund when available.
8.0%N/A
Median Revenue (Item 19)
$444KN/A
Cash-on-Cash Return
Estimated when revenue and margin assumptions are available.
28.8%N/A
Payback Period
3.5 yrsN/A
Revenue per Dollar Invested
2.88xN/A
Franchised Units
16094
1-Year Net Unit Change
-70
Net Unit Growth Rate
-5.0%0.0%
Net Closure Rate
Net closure proxy based on disclosed unit change.
4.2%N/A
SBA Default Rate
35.9%N/A
SBA Loan Count
Use this to judge whether SBA default data is statistically meaningful.
108N/A
Average SBA Loan Size
$162KN/A
Item 19 Status
Revenue OnlyCost Data Only
Has Item 19
✓ Yes✓ Yes
Data Quality Score
10060

What stands out

  • 360 Painting opens at $112K to $196K, while Neat Method ranges from $38K to $45K.
  • 360 Painting shows an Item 19 disclosure; Neat Method shows an Item 19 disclosure.
  • 360 Painting has 160 franchised units versus 94 for Neat Method.

Turn this into a buy-side memo

Unlock full compare access, then order a deeper FDD report with litigation review, red flags, and an investment thesis you can share with partners or lenders.

Last updated: April 2026