7 BREW vs THE MELTING POT

Compare FDD disclosures, investment range, royalty and ad fund burden, SBA lending outcomes, Item 20-style unit movement, Item 19 transparency, and data-confidence caveats with a permanent shareable URL.

Share this page
https://fddiq.com/compare/7-brew-vs-the-melting-pot
7 BREW
Casual Dining
Investment
$894K to $2.2M
Franchise fee
$35,000
Item 19 status
Revenue Only
Confidence
High Confidence
Units
137
THE MELTING POT
Casual Dining
Investment
$1.6M to $2.7M
Franchise fee
$45,000
Item 19 status
Limited Data
Confidence
High Confidence
Units
89
Lower entry cost
Leans left
Based on disclosed minimum initial investment only; buyer cash needs may be higher after working capital, lease, and financing assumptions.
Better disclosed economics
7 BREW
Uses the same Item 19 transparency hierarchy shown on franchise pages and rankings.
Lower SBA default risk
Even
Treat low-loan brands carefully; sample size and SBA borrower mix matter.
Metric7 BREWTHE MELTING POT
Franchise Fee
From disclosed FDD fee data when available; excludes buyer-specific legal, diligence, and financing costs.
$35,000$45,000
Min Investment
Lower bound of disclosed initial investment range, not a recommended capital budget.
$894K$1.6M
Max Investment
Upper end of FDD range; still reconcile to site, lease, buildout, and working-capital assumptions.
$2.2M$2.7M
Royalty Rate
Ongoing royalty burden before local store economics and owner salary.
7.0%5.0%
Ad Fund Rate
National/brand fund rate when disclosed; local marketing may be additive.
2.0%2.2%
Total Ongoing Burden
Royalty plus ad fund when available.
9.0%7.2%
Median Revenue (Item 19)
Only meaningful when the franchisor provides an Item 19 financial-performance representation.
$2.1M$1.9M
Cash-on-Cash Return
Estimated when revenue and margin assumptions are available.
1.3%2.5%
Payback Period
74.5 yrs40.4 yrs
Revenue per Dollar Invested
1.34x0.88x
Franchised Units
Latest disclosed franchised-unit count in the corpus.
13789
1-Year Net Unit Change
Item 20-style system movement signal; investigate transfers, closures, and refranchising before assuming organic growth.
N/A-3
Net Unit Growth Rate
N/A-3.3%
Net Closure Rate
Net closure proxy based on disclosed unit change.
N/A3.3%
SBA Default Rate
Historical SBA performance for matched loans, not a prediction for a new buyer or location.
0.0%0.0%
SBA Loan Count
Use this to judge whether SBA default data is statistically meaningful.
2131
Average SBA Loan Size
$1.1M$955K
Item 19 Status
Canonical transparency badge used across franchise, ranking, and compare surfaces.
Revenue OnlyLimited Data
Has Item 19
✓ Yes✓ Yes
Data Confidence
Derived from the same data-quality thresholds used on franchise pages.
High Confidence · 100/100High Confidence · 100/100

What stands out

  • 7 BREW discloses an initial investment range of $894K to $2.2M, while THE MELTING POT discloses $1.6M to $2.7M. Treat these as FDD ranges, not a full purchase budget.
  • 7 BREW shows an Item 19 financial-performance disclosure; THE MELTING POT shows an Item 19 financial-performance disclosure. Missing Item 19 data should narrow confidence, not automatically kill a brand.
  • 7 BREW has 137 franchised units versus 89 for THE MELTING POT; use one-year net unit movement and closure proxies as early diligence signals, not final underwriting.

Turn this into a buy-side memo

Unlock full compare access, then order a deeper FDD report with franchise-agreement red flags, source-document caveats, buyer assumptions, and an investment thesis you can share with partners or lenders.

Last updated: May 2026