Camp Run-A-Mutt vs Sonesta RL Hotels Franchising Inc. (Red Lion)

Compare FDD disclosures, investment range, royalty and ad fund burden, SBA lending outcomes, Item 20-style unit movement, Item 19 transparency, and data-confidence caveats with a permanent shareable URL.

Share this page
https://fddiq.com/compare/camp-run-a-mutt-vs-sonesta-rl-hotels-red-lion
Camp Run-A-Mutt
Travel
Investment
$527K to $1.0M
Franchise fee
$40,000
Item 19 status
Revenue Only
Confidence
High Confidence
Units
N/A
Sonesta RL Hotels Franchising Inc. (Red Lion)
Travel
Investment
$541K to $33.5M
Franchise fee
$75,000
Item 19 status
Confidence
High Confidence
Units
56
Lower entry cost
Leans left
Based on disclosed minimum initial investment only; buyer cash needs may be higher after working capital, lease, and financing assumptions.
Better disclosed economics
Camp Run-A-Mutt
Uses the same Item 19 transparency hierarchy shown on franchise pages and rankings.
Lower SBA default risk
Even
Treat low-loan brands carefully; sample size and SBA borrower mix matter.
MetricCamp Run-A-MuttSonesta RL Hotels Franchising Inc. (Red Lion)
Franchise Fee
From disclosed FDD fee data when available; excludes buyer-specific legal, diligence, and financing costs.
$40,000$75,000
Min Investment
Lower bound of disclosed initial investment range, not a recommended capital budget.
$527K$541K
Max Investment
Upper end of FDD range; still reconcile to site, lease, buildout, and working-capital assumptions.
$1.0M$33.5M
Royalty Rate
Ongoing royalty burden before local store economics and owner salary.
6.0%5.0%
Ad Fund Rate
National/brand fund rate when disclosed; local marketing may be additive.
1.0%3.0%
Total Ongoing Burden
Royalty plus ad fund when available.
7.0%8.0%
Median Revenue (Item 19)
Only meaningful when the franchisor provides an Item 19 financial-performance representation.
$576KN/A
Cash-on-Cash Return
Estimated when revenue and margin assumptions are available.
5.9%N/A
Payback Period
17.0 yrsN/A
Revenue per Dollar Invested
0.74xN/A
Franchised Units
Latest disclosed franchised-unit count in the corpus.
N/A56
1-Year Net Unit Change
Item 20-style system movement signal; investigate transfers, closures, and refranchising before assuming organic growth.
-20
Net Unit Growth Rate
-15.4%0.0%
Net Closure Rate
Net closure proxy based on disclosed unit change.
N/AN/A
SBA Default Rate
Historical SBA performance for matched loans, not a prediction for a new buyer or location.
50.0%N/A
SBA Loan Count
Use this to judge whether SBA default data is statistically meaningful.
13N/A
Average SBA Loan Size
$462KN/A
Item 19 Status
Canonical transparency badge used across franchise, ranking, and compare surfaces.
Revenue Only
Has Item 19
✓ Yes✓ Yes
Data Confidence
Derived from the same data-quality thresholds used on franchise pages.
High Confidence · 85/100High Confidence · 85/100

What stands out

  • Camp Run-A-Mutt discloses an initial investment range of $527K to $1.0M, while Sonesta RL Hotels Franchising Inc. (Red Lion) discloses $541K to $33.5M. Treat these as FDD ranges, not a full purchase budget.
  • Camp Run-A-Mutt shows an Item 19 financial-performance disclosure; Sonesta RL Hotels Franchising Inc. (Red Lion) shows an Item 19 financial-performance disclosure. Missing Item 19 data should narrow confidence, not automatically kill a brand.
  • Camp Run-A-Mutt has N/A franchised units versus 56 for Sonesta RL Hotels Franchising Inc. (Red Lion); use one-year net unit movement and closure proxies as early diligence signals, not final underwriting.

Turn this into a buy-side memo

Unlock full compare access, then order a deeper FDD report with franchise-agreement red flags, source-document caveats, buyer assumptions, and an investment thesis you can share with partners or lenders.

Last updated: May 2026