Elements Therapeutic Massage vs Medi-Weightloss

Compare FDD disclosures, investment range, royalty and ad fund burden, SBA lending outcomes, Item 20-style unit movement, Item 19 transparency, and data-confidence caveats with a permanent shareable URL.

Share this page
https://fddiq.com/compare/elements-therapeutic-massage-vs-medi-weightloss
Elements Therapeutic Massage
Health/Wellness
Investment
$471K to $694K
Franchise fee
$40,000
Item 19 status
Limited Data
Confidence
High Confidence
Units
244
Medi-Weightloss
Health/Wellness
Investment
$251K to $494K
Franchise fee
$60,000
Item 19 status
Revenue Only
Confidence
High Confidence
Units
88
Lower entry cost
Leans right
Based on disclosed minimum initial investment only; buyer cash needs may be higher after working capital, lease, and financing assumptions.
Better disclosed economics
Medi-Weightloss
Uses the same Item 19 transparency hierarchy shown on franchise pages and rankings.
Lower SBA default risk
Leans left
Treat low-loan brands carefully; sample size and SBA borrower mix matter.
MetricElements Therapeutic MassageMedi-Weightloss
Franchise Fee
From disclosed FDD fee data when available; excludes buyer-specific legal, diligence, and financing costs.
$40,000$60,000
Min Investment
Lower bound of disclosed initial investment range, not a recommended capital budget.
$471K$251K
Max Investment
Upper end of FDD range; still reconcile to site, lease, buildout, and working-capital assumptions.
$694K$494K
Royalty Rate
Ongoing royalty burden before local store economics and owner salary.
6.0%10.0%
Ad Fund Rate
National/brand fund rate when disclosed; local marketing may be additive.
2.0%1.0%
Total Ongoing Burden
Royalty plus ad fund when available.
8.0%11.0%
Median Revenue (Item 19)
Only meaningful when the franchisor provides an Item 19 financial-performance representation.
$832K$884K
Cash-on-Cash Return
Estimated when revenue and margin assumptions are available.
17.1%21.3%
Payback Period
5.8 yrs4.7 yrs
Revenue per Dollar Invested
1.43x2.37x
Franchised Units
Latest disclosed franchised-unit count in the corpus.
24488
1-Year Net Unit Change
Item 20-style system movement signal; investigate transfers, closures, and refranchising before assuming organic growth.
-5N/A
Net Unit Growth Rate
-2.0%N/A
Net Closure Rate
Net closure proxy based on disclosed unit change.
2.0%N/A
SBA Default Rate
Historical SBA performance for matched loans, not a prediction for a new buyer or location.
2.9%13.6%
SBA Loan Count
Use this to judge whether SBA default data is statistically meaningful.
7453
Average SBA Loan Size
$245K$229K
Item 19 Status
Canonical transparency badge used across franchise, ranking, and compare surfaces.
Limited DataRevenue Only
Has Item 19
✓ Yes✓ Yes
Data Confidence
Derived from the same data-quality thresholds used on franchise pages.
High Confidence · 100/100High Confidence · 100/100

What stands out

  • Elements Therapeutic Massage discloses an initial investment range of $471K to $694K, while Medi-Weightloss discloses $251K to $494K. Treat these as FDD ranges, not a full purchase budget.
  • Elements Therapeutic Massage shows an Item 19 financial-performance disclosure; Medi-Weightloss shows an Item 19 financial-performance disclosure. Missing Item 19 data should narrow confidence, not automatically kill a brand.
  • Elements Therapeutic Massage has 244 franchised units versus 88 for Medi-Weightloss; use one-year net unit movement and closure proxies as early diligence signals, not final underwriting.

Turn this into a buy-side memo

Unlock full compare access, then order a deeper FDD report with franchise-agreement red flags, source-document caveats, buyer assumptions, and an investment thesis you can share with partners or lenders.

Last updated: May 2026