Evans Garment Restoration II, LLC vs FIVE STAR PAINTING

Compare FDD disclosures, investment range, royalty and ad fund burden, SBA lending outcomes, Item 20-style unit movement, Item 19 transparency, and data-confidence caveats with a permanent shareable URL.

Share this page
https://fddiq.com/compare/evans-garment-restoration-ii-vs-five-star-painting
Evans Garment Restoration II, LLC
Home Services
Investment
$86K to $304K
Franchise fee
$40,000
Item 19 status
Confidence
Medium Confidence
Units
1
FIVE STAR PAINTING
Home Services
Investment
$77K to $185K
Franchise fee
$45,000
Item 19 status
Limited Data
Confidence
High Confidence
Units
234
Lower entry cost
Leans right
Based on disclosed minimum initial investment only; buyer cash needs may be higher after working capital, lease, and financing assumptions.
Better disclosed economics
FIVE STAR PAINTING
Uses the same Item 19 transparency hierarchy shown on franchise pages and rankings.
Lower SBA default risk
Even
Treat low-loan brands carefully; sample size and SBA borrower mix matter.
MetricEvans Garment Restoration II, LLCFIVE STAR PAINTING
Franchise Fee
From disclosed FDD fee data when available; excludes buyer-specific legal, diligence, and financing costs.
$40,000$45,000
Min Investment
Lower bound of disclosed initial investment range, not a recommended capital budget.
$86K$77K
Max Investment
Upper end of FDD range; still reconcile to site, lease, buildout, and working-capital assumptions.
$304K$185K
Royalty Rate
Ongoing royalty burden before local store economics and owner salary.
6.0%6.0%
Ad Fund Rate
National/brand fund rate when disclosed; local marketing may be additive.
2.0%2.0%
Total Ongoing Burden
Royalty plus ad fund when available.
8.0%8.0%
Median Revenue (Item 19)
Only meaningful when the franchisor provides an Item 19 financial-performance representation.
N/AN/A
Cash-on-Cash Return
Estimated when revenue and margin assumptions are available.
N/AN/A
Payback Period
N/AN/A
Revenue per Dollar Invested
N/AN/A
Franchised Units
Latest disclosed franchised-unit count in the corpus.
1234
1-Year Net Unit Change
Item 20-style system movement signal; investigate transfers, closures, and refranchising before assuming organic growth.
N/A11
Net Unit Growth Rate
N/A4.8%
Net Closure Rate
Net closure proxy based on disclosed unit change.
N/AN/A
SBA Default Rate
Historical SBA performance for matched loans, not a prediction for a new buyer or location.
N/A32.4%
SBA Loan Count
Use this to judge whether SBA default data is statistically meaningful.
N/A74
Average SBA Loan Size
N/A$156K
Item 19 Status
Canonical transparency badge used across franchise, ranking, and compare surfaces.
Limited Data
Has Item 19
✓ Yes✓ Yes
Data Confidence
Derived from the same data-quality thresholds used on franchise pages.
Medium Confidence · 75/100High Confidence · 85/100

What stands out

  • Evans Garment Restoration II, LLC discloses an initial investment range of $86K to $304K, while FIVE STAR PAINTING discloses $77K to $185K. Treat these as FDD ranges, not a full purchase budget.
  • Evans Garment Restoration II, LLC shows an Item 19 financial-performance disclosure; FIVE STAR PAINTING shows an Item 19 financial-performance disclosure. Missing Item 19 data should narrow confidence, not automatically kill a brand.
  • Evans Garment Restoration II, LLC has 1 franchised units versus 234 for FIVE STAR PAINTING; use one-year net unit movement and closure proxies as early diligence signals, not final underwriting.

Turn this into a buy-side memo

Unlock full compare access, then order a deeper FDD report with franchise-agreement red flags, source-document caveats, buyer assumptions, and an investment thesis you can share with partners or lenders.

Last updated: May 2026