Hungry Howie’s Pizza & Subs, Inc. vs BURGER 21

Compare FDD disclosures, investment range, royalty and ad fund burden, SBA lending outcomes, Item 20-style unit movement, Item 19 transparency, and data-confidence caveats with a permanent shareable URL.

Share this page
https://fddiq.com/compare/hungry-howie-s-pizza-subs-vs-burger-21
Hungry Howie’s Pizza & Subs, Inc.
QSR
Investment
$319K to $520K
Franchise fee
$25,000
Item 19 status
Confidence
High Confidence
Units
501
BURGER 21
QSR
Investment
$413K to $1.1M
Franchise fee
$40,000
Item 19 status
Revenue Only
Confidence
High Confidence
Units
5
Lower entry cost
Leans left
Based on disclosed minimum initial investment only; buyer cash needs may be higher after working capital, lease, and financing assumptions.
Better disclosed economics
BURGER 21
Uses the same Item 19 transparency hierarchy shown on franchise pages and rankings.
Lower SBA default risk
Leans left
Treat low-loan brands carefully; sample size and SBA borrower mix matter.
MetricHungry Howie’s Pizza & Subs, Inc.BURGER 21
Franchise Fee
From disclosed FDD fee data when available; excludes buyer-specific legal, diligence, and financing costs.
$25,000$40,000
Min Investment
Lower bound of disclosed initial investment range, not a recommended capital budget.
$319K$413K
Max Investment
Upper end of FDD range; still reconcile to site, lease, buildout, and working-capital assumptions.
$520K$1.1M
Royalty Rate
Ongoing royalty burden before local store economics and owner salary.
5.5%5.0%
Ad Fund Rate
National/brand fund rate when disclosed; local marketing may be additive.
7.0%1.0%
Total Ongoing Burden
Royalty plus ad fund when available.
12.5%6.0%
Median Revenue (Item 19)
Only meaningful when the franchisor provides an Item 19 financial-performance representation.
N/A$1.3M
Cash-on-Cash Return
Estimated when revenue and margin assumptions are available.
N/A12.6%
Payback Period
N/A7.9 yrs
Revenue per Dollar Invested
N/A1.80x
Franchised Units
Latest disclosed franchised-unit count in the corpus.
5015
1-Year Net Unit Change
Item 20-style system movement signal; investigate transfers, closures, and refranchising before assuming organic growth.
3N/A
Net Unit Growth Rate
0.6%N/A
Net Closure Rate
Net closure proxy based on disclosed unit change.
N/AN/A
SBA Default Rate
Historical SBA performance for matched loans, not a prediction for a new buyer or location.
16.0%33.3%
SBA Loan Count
Use this to judge whether SBA default data is statistically meaningful.
2616
Average SBA Loan Size
$250K$587K
Item 19 Status
Canonical transparency badge used across franchise, ranking, and compare surfaces.
Revenue Only
Has Item 19
✓ Yes✓ Yes
Data Confidence
Derived from the same data-quality thresholds used on franchise pages.
High Confidence · 83/100High Confidence · 98/100

What stands out

  • Hungry Howie’s Pizza & Subs, Inc. discloses an initial investment range of $319K to $520K, while BURGER 21 discloses $413K to $1.1M. Treat these as FDD ranges, not a full purchase budget.
  • Hungry Howie’s Pizza & Subs, Inc. shows an Item 19 financial-performance disclosure; BURGER 21 shows an Item 19 financial-performance disclosure. Missing Item 19 data should narrow confidence, not automatically kill a brand.
  • Hungry Howie’s Pizza & Subs, Inc. has 501 franchised units versus 5 for BURGER 21; use one-year net unit movement and closure proxies as early diligence signals, not final underwriting.

Turn this into a buy-side memo

Unlock full compare access, then order a deeper FDD report with franchise-agreement red flags, source-document caveats, buyer assumptions, and an investment thesis you can share with partners or lenders.

Last updated: May 2026