Kid to Kid vs ROMP N’ ROLL

Compare franchise fees, investment range, royalties, SBA lending performance, unit growth, and Item 19 transparency with a permanent shareable URL.

Share this page
https://fddiq.com/compare/kid-to-kid-vs-romp-n-roll
Kid to Kid
Child Services
Investment
$327K to $587K
Franchise fee
$25,000
Item 19 status
Cost Data Only
Units
4
ROMP N’ ROLL
Child Services
Investment
$322K to $475K
Franchise fee
$55,000
Item 19 status
Revenue Only
Units
7
Lower entry cost
Leans right
Based on minimum initial investment.
Better disclosed economics
Even
Uses Item 19 availability and transparency status.
Lower SBA default risk
Leans right
Treat low-loan brands carefully, sample size matters.
MetricKid to KidROMP N’ ROLL
Franchise Fee
$25,000$55,000
Min Investment
$327K$322K
Max Investment
$587K$475K
Royalty Rate
5.0%8.0%
Ad Fund Rate
0.5%2.0%
Total Ongoing Burden
Royalty plus ad fund when available.
5.5%10.0%
Median Revenue (Item 19)
$937K$385K
Cash-on-Cash Return
Estimated when revenue and margin assumptions are available.
50.3%19.3%
Payback Period
2.0 yrs5.2 yrs
Revenue per Dollar Invested
2.05x0.96x
Franchised Units
47
1-Year Net Unit Change
23
Net Unit Growth Rate
33.3%42.9%
Net Closure Rate
Net closure proxy based on disclosed unit change.
N/AN/A
SBA Default Rate
12.9%0.0%
SBA Loan Count
Use this to judge whether SBA default data is statistically meaningful.
656
Average SBA Loan Size
$300K$216K
Item 19 Status
Cost Data OnlyRevenue Only
Has Item 19
✓ Yes✓ Yes
Data Quality Score
10098

What stands out

  • Kid to Kid opens at $327K to $587K, while ROMP N’ ROLL ranges from $322K to $475K.
  • Kid to Kid shows an Item 19 disclosure; ROMP N’ ROLL shows an Item 19 disclosure.
  • Kid to Kid has 4 franchised units versus 7 for ROMP N’ ROLL.

Turn this into a buy-side memo

Unlock full compare access, then order a deeper FDD report with litigation review, red flags, and an investment thesis you can share with partners or lenders.

Last updated: April 2026