Sanford Rose Associates vs Patrice & Associates

Compare FDD disclosures, investment range, royalty and ad fund burden, SBA lending outcomes, Item 20-style unit movement, Item 19 transparency, and data-confidence caveats with a permanent shareable URL.

Share this page
https://fddiq.com/compare/sanford-rose-associates-vs-patrice-associates
Sanford Rose Associates
Staffing
Investment
$11K to $15K
Franchise fee
$7,500
Item 19 status
Limited Data
Confidence
High Confidence
Units
181
Patrice & Associates
Staffing
Investment
$105K to $121K
Franchise fee
$65,000
Item 19 status
Revenue Only
Confidence
High Confidence
Units
17
Lower entry cost
Leans left
Based on disclosed minimum initial investment only; buyer cash needs may be higher after working capital, lease, and financing assumptions.
Better disclosed economics
Patrice & Associates
Uses the same Item 19 transparency hierarchy shown on franchise pages and rankings.
Lower SBA default risk
Leans left
Treat low-loan brands carefully; sample size and SBA borrower mix matter.
MetricSanford Rose AssociatesPatrice & Associates
Franchise Fee
From disclosed FDD fee data when available; excludes buyer-specific legal, diligence, and financing costs.
$7,500$65,000
Min Investment
Lower bound of disclosed initial investment range, not a recommended capital budget.
$11K$105K
Max Investment
Upper end of FDD range; still reconcile to site, lease, buildout, and working-capital assumptions.
$15K$121K
Royalty Rate
Ongoing royalty burden before local store economics and owner salary.
5.5%10.0%
Ad Fund Rate
National/brand fund rate when disclosed; local marketing may be additive.
N/A2.0%
Total Ongoing Burden
Royalty plus ad fund when available.
6.0%12.0%
Median Revenue (Item 19)
Only meaningful when the franchisor provides an Item 19 financial-performance representation.
N/A$3K
Cash-on-Cash Return
Estimated when revenue and margin assumptions are available.
N/A0.0%
Payback Period
N/AN/A
Revenue per Dollar Invested
N/A0.02x
Franchised Units
Latest disclosed franchised-unit count in the corpus.
18117
1-Year Net Unit Change
Item 20-style system movement signal; investigate transfers, closures, and refranchising before assuming organic growth.
N/A-16
Net Unit Growth Rate
N/AN/A
Net Closure Rate
Net closure proxy based on disclosed unit change.
N/A48.5%
SBA Default Rate
Historical SBA performance for matched loans, not a prediction for a new buyer or location.
0.0%31.8%
SBA Loan Count
Use this to judge whether SBA default data is statistically meaningful.
1297
Average SBA Loan Size
$180K$130K
Item 19 Status
Canonical transparency badge used across franchise, ranking, and compare surfaces.
Limited DataRevenue Only
Has Item 19
✓ Yes✓ Yes
Data Confidence
Derived from the same data-quality thresholds used on franchise pages.
High Confidence · 85/100High Confidence · 100/100

What stands out

  • Sanford Rose Associates discloses an initial investment range of $11K to $15K, while Patrice & Associates discloses $105K to $121K. Treat these as FDD ranges, not a full purchase budget.
  • Sanford Rose Associates shows an Item 19 financial-performance disclosure; Patrice & Associates shows an Item 19 financial-performance disclosure. Missing Item 19 data should narrow confidence, not automatically kill a brand.
  • Sanford Rose Associates has 181 franchised units versus 17 for Patrice & Associates; use one-year net unit movement and closure proxies as early diligence signals, not final underwriting.

Turn this into a buy-side memo

Unlock full compare access, then order a deeper FDD report with franchise-agreement red flags, source-document caveats, buyer assumptions, and an investment thesis you can share with partners or lenders.

Last updated: May 2026