SIZZLER® vs The Brass Tap

Compare franchise fees, investment range, royalties, SBA lending performance, unit growth, and Item 19 transparency with a permanent shareable URL.

Share this page
https://fddiq.com/compare/sizzler-vs-the-brass-tap
SIZZLER®
Casual Dining
Investment
$1.3M to $2.6M
Franchise fee
$35,000
Item 19 status
Revenue Only
Units
116
The Brass Tap
Casual Dining
Investment
$793K to $1.3M
Franchise fee
$25,000
Item 19 status
Revenue Only
Units
6
Lower entry cost
Leans right
Based on minimum initial investment.
Better disclosed economics
Even
Uses Item 19 availability and transparency status.
Lower SBA default risk
Leans right
Treat low-loan brands carefully, sample size matters.
MetricSIZZLER®The Brass Tap
Franchise Fee
$35,000$25,000
Min Investment
$1.3M$793K
Max Investment
$2.6M$1.3M
Royalty Rate
4.0%5.0%
Ad Fund Rate
0.5%2.0%
Total Ongoing Burden
Royalty plus ad fund when available.
4.5%7.0%
Median Revenue (Item 19)
$1.9M$1.3M
Cash-on-Cash Return
Estimated when revenue and margin assumptions are available.
5.4%3.8%
Payback Period
18.4 yrs26.2 yrs
Revenue per Dollar Invested
0.99x1.27x
Franchised Units
1166
1-Year Net Unit Change
-47
Net Unit Growth Rate
-3.4%116.7%
Net Closure Rate
Net closure proxy based on disclosed unit change.
3.3%N/A
SBA Default Rate
20.0%4.8%
SBA Loan Count
Use this to judge whether SBA default data is statistically meaningful.
567
Average SBA Loan Size
$626K$840K
Item 19 Status
Revenue OnlyRevenue Only
Has Item 19
✓ Yes✓ Yes
Data Quality Score
98100

What stands out

  • SIZZLER® opens at $1.3M to $2.6M, while The Brass Tap ranges from $793K to $1.3M.
  • SIZZLER® shows an Item 19 disclosure; The Brass Tap shows an Item 19 disclosure.
  • SIZZLER® has 116 franchised units versus 6 for The Brass Tap.

Turn this into a buy-side memo

Unlock full compare access, then order a deeper FDD report with litigation review, red flags, and an investment thesis you can share with partners or lenders.

Last updated: April 2026