Elements Therapeutic Massage vs Miracle-Ear

Compare FDD disclosures, investment range, royalty and ad fund burden, SBA lending outcomes, Item 20-style unit movement, Item 19 transparency, and data-confidence caveats with a permanent shareable URL.

Share this page
https://fddiq.com/compare/elements-therapeutic-massage-vs-miracle-ear
Elements Therapeutic Massage
Health/Wellness
Investment
$471K to $694K
Franchise fee
$40,000
Item 19 status
Limited Data
Confidence
High Confidence
Units
244
Miracle-Ear
Health/Wellness
Investment
$120K to $403K
Franchise fee
$20,000
Item 19 status
Revenue Only
Confidence
High Confidence
Units
1,260
Lower entry cost
Leans right
Based on disclosed minimum initial investment only; buyer cash needs may be higher after working capital, lease, and financing assumptions.
Better disclosed economics
Miracle-Ear
Uses the same Item 19 transparency hierarchy shown on franchise pages and rankings.
Lower SBA default risk
Leans right
Treat low-loan brands carefully; sample size and SBA borrower mix matter.
MetricElements Therapeutic MassageMiracle-Ear
Franchise Fee
From disclosed FDD fee data when available; excludes buyer-specific legal, diligence, and financing costs.
$40,000$20,000
Min Investment
Lower bound of disclosed initial investment range, not a recommended capital budget.
$471K$120K
Max Investment
Upper end of FDD range; still reconcile to site, lease, buildout, and working-capital assumptions.
$694K$403K
Royalty Rate
Ongoing royalty burden before local store economics and owner salary.
6.0%N/A
Ad Fund Rate
National/brand fund rate when disclosed; local marketing may be additive.
2.0%0.1%
Total Ongoing Burden
Royalty plus ad fund when available.
8.0%N/A
Median Revenue (Item 19)
Only meaningful when the franchisor provides an Item 19 financial-performance representation.
$832K$393K
Cash-on-Cash Return
Estimated when revenue and margin assumptions are available.
17.1%30.1%
Payback Period
5.8 yrs3.3 yrs
Revenue per Dollar Invested
1.43x1.50x
Franchised Units
Latest disclosed franchised-unit count in the corpus.
2441,260
1-Year Net Unit Change
Item 20-style system movement signal; investigate transfers, closures, and refranchising before assuming organic growth.
-5-15
Net Unit Growth Rate
-2.0%-1.2%
Net Closure Rate
Net closure proxy based on disclosed unit change.
2.0%1.2%
SBA Default Rate
Historical SBA performance for matched loans, not a prediction for a new buyer or location.
2.9%0.0%
SBA Loan Count
Use this to judge whether SBA default data is statistically meaningful.
746
Average SBA Loan Size
$245K$734K
Item 19 Status
Canonical transparency badge used across franchise, ranking, and compare surfaces.
Limited DataRevenue Only
Has Item 19
✓ Yes✓ Yes
Data Confidence
Derived from the same data-quality thresholds used on franchise pages.
High Confidence · 100/100High Confidence · 85/100

What stands out

  • Elements Therapeutic Massage discloses an initial investment range of $471K to $694K, while Miracle-Ear discloses $120K to $403K. Treat these as FDD ranges, not a full purchase budget.
  • Elements Therapeutic Massage shows an Item 19 financial-performance disclosure; Miracle-Ear shows an Item 19 financial-performance disclosure. Missing Item 19 data should narrow confidence, not automatically kill a brand.
  • Elements Therapeutic Massage has 244 franchised units versus 1,260 for Miracle-Ear; use one-year net unit movement and closure proxies as early diligence signals, not final underwriting.

Turn this into a buy-side memo

Unlock full compare access, then order a deeper FDD report with franchise-agreement red flags, source-document caveats, buyer assumptions, and an investment thesis you can share with partners or lenders.

Last updated: May 2026