Maaco vs Tuffy

Compare franchise fees, investment range, royalties, SBA lending performance, unit growth, and Item 19 transparency with a permanent shareable URL.

Share this page
https://fddiq.com/compare/maaco-vs-tuffy
Maaco
Automotive
Investment
$196K to $4.0M
Franchise fee
$45,000
Item 19 status
Revenue Only
Units
376
Tuffy
Automotive
Investment
$222K to $724K
Franchise fee
$30,000
Item 19 status
Revenue Only
Units
100
Lower entry cost
Leans left
Based on minimum initial investment.
Better disclosed economics
Even
Uses Item 19 availability and transparency status.
Lower SBA default risk
Even
Treat low-loan brands carefully, sample size matters.
MetricMaacoTuffy
Franchise Fee
$45,000$30,000
Min Investment
$196K$222K
Max Investment
$4.0M$724K
Royalty Rate
8.0%5.0%
Ad Fund Rate
N/A5.0%
Total Ongoing Burden
Royalty plus ad fund when available.
8.0%10.0%
Median Revenue (Item 19)
$1.3M$1.3M
Cash-on-Cash Return
Estimated when revenue and margin assumptions are available.
4.5%14.2%
Payback Period
22.2 yrs7.0 yrs
Revenue per Dollar Invested
0.64x2.84x
Franchised Units
376100
1-Year Net Unit Change
-131
Net Unit Growth Rate
-3.3%1.0%
Net Closure Rate
Net closure proxy based on disclosed unit change.
3.3%N/A
SBA Default Rate
17.6%N/A
SBA Loan Count
Use this to judge whether SBA default data is statistically meaningful.
86N/A
Average SBA Loan Size
$669KN/A
Item 19 Status
Revenue OnlyRevenue Only
Has Item 19
✓ Yes✓ Yes
Data Quality Score
90100

What stands out

  • Maaco opens at $196K to $4.0M, while Tuffy ranges from $222K to $724K.
  • Maaco shows an Item 19 disclosure; Tuffy shows an Item 19 disclosure.
  • Maaco has 376 franchised units versus 100 for Tuffy.

Turn this into a buy-side memo

Unlock full compare access, then order a deeper FDD report with litigation review, red flags, and an investment thesis you can share with partners or lenders.

Last updated: April 2026